03:58
Excellent Johnson
Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Wike
Hearing
of the main petition filed by the All Progressives Congress and its
governorship candidate in the April 11, 2015 election in Rivers State,
Dakuku Peterside, challenging the election of Governor Nyesom Wike of
the Peoples Democratic Party, began on Thursday.
The APC and Peterside called their first
set of witnesses to testify before the Rivers State Governorship
Election Petitions Tribunal in Abuja on Thursday after about four months
of battling with a series of interlocutory applications filed by the
respondents seeking the dismissal of their petition at the preliminary
stage.
The tribunal has a statutory limit of 180 days within which it must hear and determine the petition.
The hearing, however, began on Thursday
under a new chairman of the three-member tribunal, Justice Mohammed
Ambrosa, who by a letter from the President of the Court of Appeal,
Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, dated September 1, 2015, was asked to replace
the former chairman, Justice Mu’azu Pindiga.
Justice Ambrosa, who presided over the
Thursday’s proceedings, earlier dismissed the protest by Wike’s lawyer,
Mr. Emmanuel Ukala (SAN), and the counsel for the PDP, Chief Chris Uche
(SAN), against the change of the chairman of the tribunal.
Counsel for the Independent National
Electoral Commission, Mr. Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), did not, however,
protest against the change of the chairman of the tribunal. INEC, Wike
and the PDP are the respondents to the petition.
Ukala, who told the tribunal that he was
appearing in protest, urged the tribunal to either adjourn the case to
enable his team to consult on what steps to take on the development or
start the entire proceedings afresh.
“We are worried because yesterday, a
number of newspapers published a story that there were subterranean
moves by some powerful forces to implement changes in the election
tribunal and we got here this morning to find out that the story was not
a mere hallucination but a reality that is staring at us in the face,”
Ukala said.
Uche, who also subscribed to the same
line of argument, said the sudden change of the chairman of the tribunal
could threaten “a fundamental pillar of confidence in justice
administration” which he said was “rooted in transparency.”
In his response, lead counsel for the
petitioners, Chief Akin Olujinmi (SAN), said his team also became aware
of the change of the tribunal chairman only when the panel members came
into the courtroom.
He, however, said he had no reason to protest against the new head of the tribunal as the petitioners had lost a lot of time.
Olujinmi said, “We also came in this morning to find out that a new chairman has been posted to head this tribunal.
“We, on our side, cannot question your obedience of the order posting you to head this tribunal.”
In its ruling delivered by Justice Ambrosa, the tribunal dismissed the protests, saying it could not afford to waste more time.
He noted that by the 180-day limitation, the tribunal must round off its sitting on October 30.
This development, he said, would leave
his panel with only about five days to prepare its judgment after all
parties must have concluded their cases.
“The petitioners are therefore called upon to open their case,” the tribunal ordered.
Among the first set of the petitioners’
witnesses called by Oljinmi on Thursday were APC collation agents in
some wards in the state, who testified that elections did not hold in
their various domains because of the violence allegedly orchestrated by
armed thugs loyal to the PDP.
The witnesses included Jack Olugu, John
Koottee and Alabrabra Jappalli, who all testified that elections did not
hold in their respective domains.
The hearing continues Friday.
NEWS GENESIS (C) 2015 All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from News Genesis.
